Modernization of the synthesis gas turbocompressor at the Ammonia Production Unit of JSC MAXAM-CHIRCHIQ (Chirchik, Uzbekistan)

In the 1970s, 42 chemical industry plants for the production of ammonia and other mineral fertilizers were built. During the period of rapid development of ammonia synthesis technology worldwide (1970–1990), the main supplier of dynamic equipment was the Japanese company Toyo Engineering Corporation (TEC).

As part of the process equipment for large-scale ammonia production (1,360 t/day), the most structurally complex unit is the synthesis gas turbocompressor train, which includes a centrifugal compressor consisting of low-pressure (LPC), medium-pressure (MPC), and high-pressure (HPC) casings, along with a drive condensing steam turbine (ST).

For centrifugal compressors, TEC used equipment from Dresser-Clark (USA), and later from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Compressor Corporation (Japan) under license from Dresser-Clark, while the STs were manufactured by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Mechanical Drive). Between 1972 and 1975, under license from Dresser-Clark, the production of LPC, MPC, and HPC compressors was mastered by Kazan-based enterprises CJSC “NIIturbokompressor” and OJSC “Kazankompressormash”.

The prolonged service life of the equipment led to a decrease in the efficiency of compression processes in turbocompressors and energy generation in turbines. More than 50 years after the development of the original designs and the commissioning of synthesis gas turbocompressors, new structural and process solutions have been created to significantly improve equipment efficiency.

In the 2000s, as the design life of synthesis gas turbocompressors approached exhaustion, extending the operating life of the installed units and increasing mean time between overhauls through modernization became critical tasks to prevent emergency shutdowns and enhance the efficiency of ammonia production.

Increasing ammonia production efficiency by expanding unit capacity led to changes in compressor operating modes and a significant rise in gas-dynamic loads on the rotors. Implementing technical solutions without considering all process factors and the interdependence of operating parameters led to reduced reliability in synthesis gas turbocompressor operation.

Modernizations of the synthesis gas compressor carried out by Dresser-Clark were implemented at several chemical plants to increase capacity from 1,360 to 1,800 t/day. During these modernizations, the rotor and the internal casing of the medium- and high-pressure sections were replaced. The low-pressure casing was not modernized. Operating these modernized compressor trains across various plants revealed that the low-pressure casing operates outside its stable operating envelope (damping forces are insufficient to suppress excitation forces) and is characterized by high vibration levels. Absolute vibration amplitudes reach up to 12 mm/s. Vibration analysis of the casing indicates the presence of a sub-synchronous low-frequency component in the vibration spectrum. The root cause of this high vibration is rotor whirl/instability. Instability occurs in machines where the rotor operating speed equals or exceeds twice the first critical speed, resulting from aerodynamic cross-coupling forces amplified by increased throughput and circulatory forces within labyrinth seals. This instability manifests as self-excited subsynchronous rotor vibrations near the first critical frequency, meaning the rotor operates in an unstable zone under normal process conditions. Operating the low-pressure casing in this mode leads to the destruction of standard bearings and floating ring seals, as well as severe wear of flow-path labyrinth seals, which increases inter-stage gas recycling and degrades overall casing compression efficiency.

A prime example of deep modernization of a large-capacity ammonia synthesis gas compressor that achieved high reliability and efficiency is the implementation of a proprietary technical package by TRIZ, Ltd. at JSC “Maxam-Chirchiq” (Chirchiq, Uzbekistan) in 2025.

The “Ammonia-1” plant operated a classic large-scale ammonia production unit built according to TEC technology and the Soviet AM-76 design line. The core of the process is the synthesis gas turbocompressor train consisting of Dresser-Clark type compressors (Pos. 401) driven by a Mitsubishi Heavy Industries condensing steam turbine (Pos. 103-JT).

The necessity to ramp up production capacity to enhance plant efficiency by modifying turbocompressor characteristics, as well as resolving the operational issues listed above, led to the collaboration between TRIZ, Ltd. and JSC “Maxam-Chirchiq” for a comprehensive modernization of the compressor train (redesigning the flow paths of the Pos. 401 compressors and the 103JT steam turbine).

Synthesis Gas Turbocompressor Train Pos. 401.


As part of the large-scale capacity expansion program for the “Ammonia-1” shop at JSC “Maxam-Chirchiq”, TRIZ, Ltd. (General Contractor) in partnership with General Electric (GE) (Subcontractor) executed a turnkey turbocompressor modernization project.

GE executed the redesign of the turbine flow path, replacing original journal and combined journal-thrust bearings with high-load bearing assemblies supplied by TRIZ, Ltd.

Aerodynamic Bundles: To boost efficiency and dynamic stability, OEM aerodynamic bundles in the LPC, MPC, and HPC were completely replaced with upgraded proprietary designs by TRIZ, Ltd. The geometry of internal diaphragms/casings and rotor impellers was recalculated for the new gas flow regime, optimized for a target output of 1,750 t/day of ammonia.


Upgraded Low-Pressure Compressor Flow Path



Upgraded Medium-Pressure Compressor Flow Path



Upgraded High-Pressure Compressor Flow Path


Steam Turbine Flow Path: GE (General Electric) reconstructed the steam turbine, fitting it with high-reliability journal and thrust bearings to fully match its rotordynamic behavior with the upgraded compressors.

Upgraded Steam Turbine Flow Path




Turbine Bearings Manufactured by TRIZ, Ltd.


Journal Bearings: Original 5-pad tilt-pad journal bearings in the compressors were replaced with TRIZ, Ltd. proprietary 3-pad damped hydrodynamic bearings supported on self-generating hydrostatic oil squeeze-films.




Combined Journal-Thrust Bearings: Standard compressor thrust bearings were replaced with damped journal-thrust bearings providing double the axial load-carrying capacity margin in accordance with API standards and delivering highly effective radial vibration attenuation.




Floating Ring End Seals: Standard floating ring seals were replaced with engineered seals featuring superior load-bearing, damping, and sealing performance.




Flow-Path Labyrinth Seals: Standard smooth labyrinth seals were replaced with anti-swirl dimpled labyrinth seals that suppress circumferential cross-coupling forces responsible for self-excited rotor vibration.


Flexible Couplings: Standard gear couplings (LPC-Turbine, Turbine-MPC, MPC-HPC) were replaced with MSK-type flexible membrane couplings engineered by TRIZ, Ltd.

MSK-1600 Coupling (Turbine-MPC)


Actual Operational Performance Following Compressor Modernization in the “Ammonia-1” Plant at JSC “Maxam-Chirchiq”

Executing this comprehensive modernization program resolved key engineering, aerodynamic, and process bottlenecks:

1. Ammonia Production Debottlenecking:

2. Radical Increase in Compressor Polytropic Efficiency:

3. Energy Savings:

4. Suppression of Cross-Coupling Forces and Catalyst Dust Protection:

5. Extended Run Between Overhauls:

Summary of the Modernization Program Executed by TRIZ, Ltd. and GE at JSC “Maxam-Chirchiq” (“Ammonia-1” Plant)

Dynamic parameters recorded by the online vibration monitoring system on the Pos. 401 compressor train confirm a significant improvement in rotordynamic stability and mechanical integrity.

Measured rotor vibration amplitudes during critical speed transitions (in micrometers, µm):

Economic Impact of the Synthesis Gas Turbocompressor Modernization at JSC “Maxam-Chirchiq”

Prior to modernization, high-pressure steam consumption (100 atm) by the 103JT turbine was 378 t/h, with a surface condenser flow of 54 t/h at an output of 1,378 t/day of ammonia. Post-modernization steam consumption dropped to 323 t/h, with condenser flow at 52 t/h at an increased output of 1,478 t/day. Accounting for the 16–20 t/h steam reduction from the turbine upgrade, the remaining balance confirms the specific efficiency gains from the LPC, MPC, and HPC compressor casing modernizations.

Thermal and financial balance sheets verify lower overall utility consumption despite higher plant output.

Steam Balance and Output Analysis

Steam Savings Calculation

Financial Impact for JSC “Maxam-Chirchiq”

Saving 37 t/h of high-pressure steam on the Pos. 401 train provides substantial operating margin gains in ammonia production.

Estimated Financial Savings:

Modernization of the Pos. 401 synthesis gas turbocompressor at JSC “Maxam-Chirchiq” using TRIZ, Ltd. technologies—including squeeze-film bearings, anti-swirl dimpled labyrinth seals, flow-path optimizations across LPC, MPC, HPC, and turbine casings, and impeller barrel finishing—reduced vibration, lowered power consumption, and extended the equipment maintenance lifecycle.

Performance verification test runs conducted by JSC “Maxam-Chirchiq” engineering personnel (see Table) validate the aerodynamic modeling and design solutions delivered by TRIZ, Ltd. and GE.

Operating Parameters of Synthesis Gas Turbocompressor Pos. K-401 at JSC “Maxam-Chirchiq” Ammonia Plant Before and After Turnaround with Replacement of OEM Assemblies and Flow Bundles (LP, MP, HP, and Turbine) with Upgraded Designs.

Item
No.
Parameter Tag Design Norm Pre-Mod. Post-Modernization
0 Measurement Date 05.03
2022
20.03
2025
30.04
2025
22.05
2025
31.07
2025
12.09
2025
21.10
2025
1 Liquid ammonia flow from receiver 610, t/h Q-603 57.4 61.5 64.7 63.8 62.6 64.9 63.1
2 Equivalent daily plant load, t/day 1378 1478 1553 1530 1502 1558 1515
3 Turbine rotor speed, RPM S-401/2 max 11286 10660 10660 10860 10900 10895 10900 10906
4 Syngas pressure at compressor Section 1 suction, kgf/cm2 PIRCA-417 22-25 22.5 22.3 21.8 22 22 22 22
5 Syngas temperature at compressor Section 1 suction, °C T-405-1 41-45 44 41.5 41.3 44 42 42 40
6 Syngas pressure at compressor Section 4 discharge, kgf/cm2 PN-4 max 320 218 234.46 234 235 240 239 241
7 Syngas temperature at compressor Section 4 discharge, °C T-409 max 140 117 117 114 119.5 115 118 116
8 Syngas pressure at recycle stage suction, kgf/cm2 PC-V max 290 200 225 220 229 232 230 226
9 Syngas temperature at recycle stage suction, °C T-405-5 21-45 32 33 28 30 30 29 27
10 Syngas pressure at recycle stage discharge, kgf/cm2 PC-N max 320 221 231 233 235 239 238 240
11 Syngas temperature at recycle stage discharge, °C T-410 max 50 37 40 35 37 37 37 35
12 Recycle stage differential pressure, kgf/cm2 dP-410 max 22 16.4 16.4 16.7 16.4 16.0 16.6 16.2
13 Compressor Section 1 syngas flow, Nm3/h* F-401 min 180000 184000 187000 193000 194195 197300 199000 197400
14 Compressor Section 4 syngas flow, Nm3/h* F-403 min 180000 204000 205700 195300 193000 197000 197000 197000
15 Recycle stage gas flow, Nm3/h* F-404 max 1100000 942000 937000 929000 932000 946000 934000 945000
16 Anti-surge valve opening, % FCV-7, 63, 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 LPC thrust/journal bearing rotor vibration, mils G-401/1/2 max 3.5 max 3.5 0.66/0.65 0.4/0.5 0.46/0.5 0.42/0.52 0.45/0.6 0.4/0.6
18 LPC journal bearing rotor vibration, mils G-402/1/2 max 3.5 max 3.5 0.62/0.71 0.51/0.6 0.53/0.6 0.47/0.61 0.53/0.7 0.6/0.53
19 MPC journal bearing rotor vibration, mils G-403/1/2 max 3.5 max 3.5 0.45/0.48 0.45/0.62 0.64/0.6 0.43/0.62 0.53/0.3 0.4/0.6
20 MPC thrust/journal bearing rotor vibration, mils G-404/1/2 max 3.5 max 3.5 0.46/0.46 0.87/0.42 0.83/0.4 0.84/0.38 0.76/0.5 0.4/0.78
21 HPC journal bearing rotor vibration, mils G-405/1/2 max 3.5 max 3.5 0.75/0.84 0.65/0.4 0.64/0.3 0.62/0.38 0.64/0.3 0.4/0.74
22 HPC thrust/journal bearing rotor vibration, mils G-406/1/2 max 3.5 max 3.5 0.85/0.8 0.61/0.3 0.47/0.3 0.56 0.53 0.3
23 Turbine journal bearing rotor vibration, mils G-407/1/2 max 3.5 max 3.5 0.44/0.97
24 Turbine thrust/journal bearing rotor vibration, mils G-408/1/2 max 3.5 max 3.5 0.95/0.91
25 Steam pressure at turbine HP inlet, kgf/cm2 P-450 95-105 100 102 104 105 105 103 106
26 Steam temperature at turbine HP inlet, °C T-440 470-490 474 490 500 495 500 501 498
27 Steam extraction pressure, kgf/cm2 P-456 37-40 39.5 38.94 39.4 38.5 39.4 39.6 39.5
28 Steam extraction temperature, °C T-442 360-380 338 356 367 364 365 380 376
29 Steam pressure at turbine LP outlet, mm Hg P-458 -412-500 – -324 -327 -313 -312 -310 -302
30 Steam temperature at turbine LP outlet, °C T-1 65-85 99 82 88 84 82 81 75
31 Steam mass flow at turbine HP inlet, t/h F-410 max 355 378 323 321 316 314 320 315
33 Condensate flow from condenser, t/h F-412 max 75 54 52 58 61 57 59 67
* – volumetric gas flow rates normalized to 0 °C and 0.1013 MPa